2011년 12월 3일 토요일

Forrest Gump (2) Comparative Review

The book Forrest Gump and its adaptation show a clear difference in terms of its way of developing the relationship between its characters and episodes. By going over some major differences, I would like to comment on whether the adaptation succeeds in its role of retelling the story.
First, in terms of the plot, the film succeeds in trimming some episodes better left out. The book loses its compactness and sense of reality beginning with Forrest’s joining NASA and living four years with cannibals. The description of the space exploration was clumsy at best and these episodes brought an abrupt and awkward halt to the development of Jenny and Forrest’s relationship. By deleting these episodes, including running for the US Senate, the film manages to hold a more coherent plot.
However, there are some that could have been included to add taste to the film, such as harmonica playing. It is through harmonica that Forrest first meets Bubba and throughout the book, the harmonica plays an important role. It not only serves as a bond between Bubba and Forrest but as a bridge between Jenny and him as well. Although the harmonica seems insignificant, it effectively conveys the strong bonds between the characters as Forrest plays harmonica when Bubba dies and Jenny recognizes him by it. Therefore, by adding this little theme to the film, it could have been made more effective.
Second, I’d like to focus on how the book and the film develop the relationship between Forrest and some other characters. Taking Dan as an example, the film does a better job in giving a better sense of Dan’s personality and his interaction with Forrest. In the film, Dan is a unique, distinct character who sees himself destined to die like a gallant warrior; in a sense, he is a dreamer. Therefore, he blames Forrest for foiling his near-success plan by saving him in the battlefield. At first, he cannot cope with his life confined to a wheelchair, but as he begins shrimp business with Forrest, he finds new happiness and hope in life. His appearing at Forrest’s wedding with artificial legs and a whole new life clearly shows the influence he received from and gave to Forrest. In the book, however, it is only as a hospital buddy that Forrest meets Dan. Their relationship is brought to a temporary halt as Forrest encounters numerous other adventures. Although Forrest says Dan’s philosophy had a great impact on himself, it is not evidenced through episodes. Their bond seems weaker than that in the movie, and what would become of Dan’s life remains ambiguous.
Jenny is a character whom the film succeeds in endowing more multifaceted personalities to a rather flat one. Interestingly, in the film, Jenny’s genuine love for Forrest is disputable since Jenny constantly leaves Forrest to pursue her own life and only returns to him after many vicissitudes. Even then, however, she leaves him again and finds him after years with Forrest’s child. Although she then asks him to marry her, her sincerity is debatable because her reason for marrying seems to be more for the son who would be left an orphan when she dies of disease. In the book, her love is clear. Although she leaves Forrest, her reason for abandoning him is justifiable since she could not tolerate his continuing with the wrestling career. Were it not for Forrest’s insistence, Jenny would have been more than happy to live peacefully and stably with Forrest, which she says herself. Jenny in the film certainly leads a more troubled life, but it is what gives more taste to the character.
     Lastly, the successful theme that is introduced in the movie is running. Running is an important hobby that appears in the film, which doesn’t play a significant role in the book. The producer did well on this part since running helps characterize Forrest. Forrest, because he is simple, indulges in things he likes without questioning or hesitating, which is perhaps why he manages to achieve so many laudable feats. Running, out of all sports, is the simplest and the most intuitive, yet requires an extreme degree of patience and resilience. You just have to keep on running without doubting whether there is an end or not. Forrest’s running, therefore, seems consistent with his personality and is best expressed when he runs a long way until he is tired after Jenny leaves him. It’s an outlet for himself who isn’t sophisticated enough to take much interest in other sports. However, in the book, Forrest doesn’t run but just devotes himself into the shrimp business when he hears the news that Jenny had got married to another man, which is less effective in showing his troubled mind and grief.

2011년 11월 8일 화요일

Film Review: Everything Must Go



Overall rating: ★★★☆☆

  Nick is a hopeless, incompetent, lazy, jobless alcoholic. I wouldn't even want to imagine living with such a father or a husband. While Nick does show some transitions throughout the movie, still, I don't like the character that much. How he is depicted in the film arouses more of sympathy and pity than of repulsion, but however cold-hearted I may sound, I think he deserves to be punished by being fired, divorced, or betrayed by his friend. To me, it just seemed that he didn't try hard enough to fight alcoholism. He was in a favourable circumstance in which his friend offered help, and yet, he merely expresses irritation and annoyance at disasters that suddenly fall upon him. Does Nick overcome his challenge in the end? Does he have hope? Well, I still doubt whether he had entirely fought off his difficulty.



  About the film, I think Ferrell's acting was mediocre. His acting wasn't fabulous, I would say, as it gets somewhat boring in the middle, but he succeeded in conveying Nick's character through his lukewarm attitude or manner of speech. One drawback regarding the casting was the black boy. Not only was his acting clumsy, but his character still remains oblivious until the end. The black boy could definitely have added more spark to the film with better acting or more distinct character.
  In overall, it was an okay film! 

Forrest Gump (1)




It was a light, enjoyable reading so far. Looking at things from the unique perspective was fresh in itself. The part that drew my attention was Forrest’s going to the movies with Jenny Curran. While watching a movie that involved a lot of killing scenes, Forrest laughs because he thinks it is silly to shoot and kill each other in such a way:

  It is a movie about two people, a man an a lady called Bonnie an Clyde that robbed 
banks an they was some interestin other people in it also. But it was a lot of killin an 
shootin an shit like that, too. It seemed to me funny that folks would be shootin an killin 
one another that way, so's I laughed a lot when that went on, an whenever I did, Jenny 
Curran seemed to squnch down in her seat a lot.

If there was such a person, my immediate reaction would also be, “Is he out of his mind? How can he laugh at this point?” But reading this paragraph, I paused for a while because it seemed that indeed, killing and shooting each other is unbelievably ridiculous. This laugh also reminded me of my own experience of volunteering for mentally weak people. One thing I noticed about them is that they laugh very often, even at things that others normally take for granted. Maybe those people just habitually laugh, but there’s also a chance that there are reasons for why they are laughing just like Forrest Gump.
And also, Forrest’s naïve reaction when he accidentally rips Jenny’s dress and tries to manage the situation which freaks Jenny out also reminded me of what happened to me before. It was some several years ago, so it has become a faint memory, but there was one particular person at the center for disabled people that made me feel uncomfortable. At first, when he kept trying to touch me, I didn’t avoid him. But I began to feel uncomfortable and I suspected him of intentionally trying to touch me. But now that I look from Forrest’s perspective, his actions are that of very natural, childlike reactions in hope of giving a hand. Although my situation doesn’t fit exactly with this episode, perhaps it was only I who felt awkward at that moment.
Although not my favorite way of narration, Forrest Gump is surely an enjoyable, relaxing book. I don’t know if it would be “enlightening” in any way, but all books aren’t meant to convey a lesson! = )

* short note: Frankly speaking, if I were a girl, I wouldn't hang out with someone like Forrest Gump. I'd be too embarrassed! Unbelievable how a beautiful girl like Jenny so kindly befriends Forrest...

2011년 9월 18일 일요일

After watching the movie Shawshank Redemption ....

I don’t even remember when or where I watched the Shawshank Redemption for the first time. So it was a bit of surprise for me that as the movie started, I found myself remembering details to a great extent; how Boggs looked like, what kind of bird Brooks had, and even how many bottles of beer Andy asked for on the roof. Frankly speaking, if I hadn’t read the book, I wouldn’t have enjoyed watching it again.
It was quite amazing how the director made the book into the film. Not only did the movie include important details in the book, but it also heightened the message by adding some more episodes. I especially liked the music part in which everyone stands in awe as a beautiful song fills the whole prison, and Andy leisurely listens while the warden is infuriated. Though a minor event, I think it was an interesting mixture of tension and peace; while Andy and the prisoners are peacefully appreciating the music, the audience cannot resist feeling worried lest Andy be harshly punished. At the same time, however, the audience can still laugh because of Andy’s reaction, which effectively reveals his character.
Another notable difference between the book and the film was Tommy’s fate. I think this slight difference actually gives different insight into human nature. First, in the book, Tommy ends up going to a less rigorous prison under the condition that he mentions no single word about Andy’s false charge. Tommy, by compromising with the warden, is depicted as a betrayer. However, if I were to ask myself what decision I would’ve made had I been in his situation, I think I would have made the same decision, and I believe most people would have. Remaining faithful to Andy meant turning down an opportunity to see his wife and a young daughter, and risking his own life. Although he liked Andy, it was too great a loss to remain faithful to him.



In the book, however, Tommy is depicted as a faithful, heroic character. The warden takes an extreme measure of shooting him. The ordinary conception of prisoners as base and the rest as moral is completely reversed in this scene. In fact, when we think about the movie as a whole, people who act cruelly are the guards and people who seem to be unjustifiably slaved are the prisoners. While prisoners may have committed extreme violence driven by an impulse, some people out there are committing crimes but are only free because they are crafty and powerful enough to defend themselves.  
And just to mention a minor point about Andy, I felt that he wasn’t considerate enough of other people’s security when he escaped. According to a book, Andy didn’t escape right away after he was done with digging a hole. Then, wouldn’t Andy, a meticulous man to forge a new identity, have predicted that his escape could risk the people close to him, especially Red? Certainly, the guards would suspect that Red may know something. Red’s denying knowing nothing of Andy’s escape could have confined him to solitary, for instance. Considering the cruelty of guards and the warden, I think Red being released was a rather unrealistically fortunate ending.  
In general, the movie was a success in delivering the atmosphere and the theme of the book!

2011년 9월 10일 토요일

Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption... HOPE


I don’t remember exactly when, but as I read the book, I recalled watching the film “Shawshank Redemption” in still suspense. I considered the film as a prison break story of one clever man, but after reading the book, I could see that it wasn’t all about just one man. Rather, as the narrative states, “Andy was the part of me… that will rejoice no matter how old and broken and scared the rest of me is.”, it is a story of Andy and the narrative, and essentially of the universal personality that pertains to every human: the unbent hope for freedom.
At first, I was appalled by the graphic details of rape and violence in the prison and it felt as though the prison was a completely detached setting from our everyday world. However, I realized that after all, Shawshank prison may only be a microcosm of our world. Prisoners are indeed more physically restricted by bars and walls surrounding them than the “free men” walking freely outside, but the question of freedom brought me to a halt. Can we call ourselves free men?
We can’t deny that we are institutionalized in some way. Of course, we take it for granted that we can go to a shop or a bathroom, buy things, and meet people as we wish, but to a certain extent, we live bounded by the social norms, culture, rules, and small and big groups we belong to. Just as prisoners feel daunted to be allowed so much freedom when they are released after years in a prison, people need a period of adaptation whenever they are introduced to new environment.
I’ve also had an interestingly similar experience of being gradually institutionalized. When I first came to KMLA, I was suffocated by strict rules. I hated having to wake up at six o’ clock in the morning, dragging myself to go to morning exercise, being not even allowed to eat during self study time, and getting penalty points for sleeping when I couldn’t resist it. I thought, “For sixteen years, I’ve managed time and study well. Why do I have to follow these rules when I can do well on my own?” To me, the rules seemed unnecessary. However, now, I don’t find so much discomfort adjusting to KMLA life. Instead, when I become lax at home, I wish I were at school because it’s easier to self-control. The fact that there are rules, routines, and people to guard you can be comforting in a sense because self-control is hard for most people. In that sense, though the prison seemed too horrible a place to live, I could understand some prisoners’ resistance to being released.
Another question I had was, “What keeps people to live even in horrible conditions like prisons?”. While contemplating on this question by thinking of differences between Andy and other prisoners, I found that it was a possibility and hope of making a change. Andy wasn’t discouraged by a life sentence perhaps mainly because he figured a way of escaping, but I think that the library business also served a significant role as his mental support. He contributed to improving the library condition and making it the best prison library in the state. The fact that he could still make things change was hope and enough reason for his existence. There is a real-life example as well of how important one’s ability to make changes is. Shi Chang Won was imprisoned for life for murder and since the capture, he has lived in solitary for more than ten years. In prison, however, he was a model prisoner, working and learning hard, and not committing any single act of violence for ten years. He also sent letters to an official to explain his determination to improve prison conditions and read books and papers to specify his plan. But he soon found no hope, and attempted suicide. Hope of making changes on the basis of freedom to conduct one’s plans to realize the hope is, I believe, a major motivation for people to live.  
As the last comment, the most memorable line was Hope for the best and expect the worst,” by Andy. Neither optimism nor pessimism is good. I tend to be pessimistic in many situations, but with this quote in mind, I’ll be able to deal with the problem at hand with reasonable optimism and preparedness.

2011년 9월 1일 목요일

1st Assignment

Group: Five

Film: The Spiriting Away of Sen and Chihiro
Why we chose it:
This is the only movie that all of us have watched which includes the element of hero's journey

<ACT1>
1.Ordinary world:
- an ordinary japanese town
2.Call to adventure:
- a strange tunnel on the way to the family's new home
3.Refusal of the call:

- Chihiro's family is lost in an unoccupied town. Hungry, Chihiro's mom and dad eat the food gregariously without paying for the food.
Chihiro, however, chooses to look around the town and when she comes back, she sees pigs instead of her parents.
4.Meeting the mentor:

-Haku appears to tell Sen to leave the town immedately
5.Crossing the threshold:
-Chihiro, failing to find the way out with her parents, steps into the world of Ubaba by getting a job at spa town.

<ACT2>
6.Tests, Allies, Enemies:
-Test: In the spa town, people are gradually subjugated by Ubaba as they eat the food of the town and forget their original name.
Since Chihiro is unaware of such danger, she initially eats the food people give.
-Allies: Haku warns Chihiro of the danger, and she therefore manages to keep her identity.
She also becomes friends with the faceless ghost (Gaonashi).

-Enemies: Ubaba & her loyal eagle

7.Approach to the innermost cave:

-One day, Sen discovers Haku soaked in blood.
8.Ordeal:

-Chihiro discovers that Haku got hurt because he tried to steal the stamp from Ubaba's twin sister.
To ask for forgiveness and save her parents and Haku, she takes the Train of Death and arrives at Ubaba's sister's home.
9.Reward:

-On Haku and Chihiro's way back to the spa town, Chihiro suddenly remembers Haku's original name, thus liberating him from
Ubaba. Chihiro also saves her parents.

<ACT3>
10.The road back:
-Haku accompanies Chihiro in her way back to the ordinary world.
11.Resurrection:
-Chihiro finds her parents who were waiting for her at the tunnel.
12.Return with the elixir:
-The value of family
Points of contention (ifs/ands/buts):
Resurrection is a little unclear